Protecting Quantum Era Cryptography. Today.

FIQ-AES12T AES-XP-XTS Ultra-High-Performance Secure Core

High-Performance AES-XTS Core with RAMBAM-Based SCA/FI Protection

FortifyIQ’s AES-XTS IP core delivers high-throughput AES-128/256 encryption and decryption in XTS mode, optimized for data-at-rest protection in secure storage systems. Designed with a pipelined architecture, the core achieves low latency and scalable performance for SSDs, encrypted drives, and file systems. It integrates RAMBAM, FortifyIQ’s RTL-level protection scheme that provides strong resistance to side-channel and fault injection attacks through algorithmic countermeasures. Built for systems targeting FIPS 140-3 and Common Criteria, this AES-XTS core ensures robust, efficient, and physically hardened encryption for performance-critical storage applications.

Features

  • Efficient Performance
  • SCA/FIA Protections
  • Flexible Interfaces
  • Security Certification Readiness

Applications

  • Automotive Systems
  • Embedded and Industrial Control
  • Payment Systems
  • Secure Communications
  • Network Devices
Technical Overview

FortifyIQ’s AES-XTS IP core is a high-throughput encryption and decryption engine optimized for secure storage applications that require fast and reliable AES-128/256 encryption in XTS mode. Built on a deeply pipelined architecture, the core supports low-latency, multi-gigabit processing of 128-bit or 256-bit keys, with efficient handling of sector-based data encryption. This makes it ideal for SSD controllers, encrypted file systems, and full-disk encryption in embedded and enterprise storage devices. The architecture supports high-performance tweak computation and streamlined sector key management, enabling seamless integration into real-world XTS workflows with deterministic latency and high throughput.

To address physical security threats, the core incorporates RAMBAM, FortifyIQ’s advanced protection scheme against side-channel analysis (SCA) and fault injection (FI) attacks. RAMBAM applies algorithmic countermeasures at the RTL level, including masking, redundancy, and ensuring protection without relying on layout-specific constraints. These protections are technology-agnostic and effective across ASICs and FPGAs.

The IP supports standard interfaces such as AXI, AHB, or APB, and offers flexible integration with minimal firmware overhead. Developed for systems requiring FIPS 140-3 and Common Criteria compliance, the core enables secure, certifiable encryption for data-at-rest in performance-critical environments. FortifyIQ’s AES-XTS core combines speed, scalability, and hardened physical security for next-generation secure storage applications.

Deliverables

  • SystemVerilog source code or netlist
  • Testbench, input vectors, and expected results
  • Sample timing constraints, synthesis, and simulation scripts
  • Hardware Abstraction Layer (HAL) reference implementation
  • Integration, configuration, and usage manuals
  • Software library
  • Security documentation
FortifyIQ AES Algorithm
AVA_VAN.5 Evaluation & Validation Summary
SGS Brightsight Common Criteria Laboratory
Summary. The leakage analysis (Welch t-test) on over 30 million traces did not show statistically significant first- and second-order differences between trace sets with fixed and random inputs. The template-based DPA analysis, on the pseudo-random trace set for the profiling phase (15 million traces) and on a sub-set of 300k fix input traces for matching phase targeting the first-round S-box output, and template attack on ciphertext, did not indicate any potential information leakage.”
“The results for the soft IP presented in the report were obtained on the TOE which is the basic hardware implementation of the soft IP without additional levels of security (e.g. that are present in a secure silicon layout). Therefore the internal strength of the soft IP itself was evaluated. This indicates that the investigated features and parameters of the soft IP implementation should be robust against SCA and fault injection attacks in different implementations including ASIC. Nevertheless, according to the Common Criteria rules, the strength of the final composite product must be evaluated on its own
Request Technical Details