...

Secure, High-Performance Solutions
For Chips, AI, and Compliance

FortiPQC™ Post-Quantum Cryptography Implementations
FortiPQC™ Post-Quantum Cryptography Implementations

Software and hardware implementations of NIST-standard post-quantum algorithms, resistant to side-channel and fault-injection attacks. A unified API enables seamless integration across HW and SW, and the high-assurance, crypto-agile designs maintain outstanding performance, power, and area efficiency.

EDA Tools for Security Assessment and Verification

Detect and analyze side-channel and fault injection vulnerabilities, pinpointing their sources to the leaking module and even gate. They are continuously updated to include new attacks. For validating the efficiency of in-house developed cryptographic modules both pre- and post-silicon, and to verify the correctness of third-party IP integration — where integration bugs sometimes introduce new vulnerabilities.

FortiAES™, FortiMac™, FortiPKA™, FortiPQC™ and CryptoBox™ 
Hardware Security IP Cores

Compact, configurable IPs for ASIC/FPGA delivering classical and post-quantum cryptography with the highest 
security assurance. CryptoBox subsystems integrate easily into any design, while patented protections maintain 
outstanding performance, power, and area efficiency.

Cryptographic Software Libraries

High-performance and adaptable, these libraries are optimized for deployed systems as well as budget-conscious or resource-constrained devices. They include post-quantum-safe cryptography, are configurable for various use cases, and perform exceptionally well on edge devices, enabling secure operations even on limited hardware.

Leading Security Compliance for Demanding Applications

At FortifyIQ, we deliver powerful, efficient security solutions for extreme use cases where others fall short. Our technology safeguards against side-channel (SCA) and fault-injection (FI) attacks without compromising on performance, power, or space.

Why Choose FortifyIQ?

Maximum security with minimum power, latency, and area.

A Decade of Expertise

Over 10 years of research defending against advanced physical attacks (e.g., side-channel analysis, fault injection) with silicon-level defenses.

Post-Quantum Readiness

FortifyIQ delivers side-channel and 
fault-attack resistant (SCA/FIA-secure) 
post-quantum cryptography (PQC) 
with ultra-low overhead.

Theory + Practice Fusion

Combined academic rigor and industry pragmatism to deliver high-performance, scalable solutions (optimized for speed, 
power efficiency, usability).

Mathematical Precision

Algorithm-driven security via pure digital logic; compact and efficient, platform-agnostic (ASIC/FPGA).

Invincible Resilience

FortifyIQ’s protections are rigorously validated in pre-silicon analysis, FPGA prototyping, silicon testing, as applicable, ensuring systems thrive, even in hostile environments.

Professor
Adi Shamir, PhD.

The ‘S’ in RSA and Turing Prize Winner

“FortifyIQ’s solution has the potential of dramatically reducing the cost and delay associated with the manufacturing of DPA-protected devices…

This is an innovative solution to a really important problem, produced by a first-rate team of developers.”

Academic Papers

White Papers

News & Updates

SGS certification logo
FortifyIQ AES Algorithm
AVA_VAN.5 Evaluation & Validation Summary
SGS Brightsight Common Criteria Laboratory
“Summary. The leakage analysis (Welch t-test) on over 30 million traces did not show statistically significant first- and second-order differences between trace sets with fixed and random inputs. The template-based DPA analysis, on the pseudo-random trace set for the profiling phase (15 million traces) and on a sub-set of 300k fix input traces for matching phase targeting the first-round S-box output, and template attack on ciphertext, did not indicate any potential information leakage.”
“The results for the soft IP presented in the report were obtained on the TOE which is the basic hardware implementation of the soft IP without additional levels of security (e.g. that are present in a secure silicon layout). Therefore the internal strength of the soft IP itself was evaluated. This indicates that the investigated features and parameters of the soft IP implementation should be robust against SCA and fault injection attacks in different implementations including ASIC. Nevertheless, according to the Common Criteria rules, the strength of the final composite product must be evaluated on its own”
Request Technical Details