Versatile Crypto Box IP Core with Robust SCA/FI Protections for Balanced Embedded Systems
FortifyIQ’s Crypto Box IP core is a high-efficiency cryptographic solution that combines RSA, ECC, AES, and a SHA-2/HMAC engine, all with advanced protections against side-channel and fault injection attacks. Designed for devices with balanced budgets for performance, area, and power, it enables secure key exchange, digital signatures, data encryption, and message authentication in a unified, compact architecture. The AES and SHA-2/HMAC cores feature algorithmic, RTL-level protections that are implementation-agnostic, ensuring consistent resistance to physical attacks across platforms. With support for secure boot, authenticated firmware updates, and compliance with FIPS 140-3 and Common Criteria, this Crypto Box is ideal for embedded applications requiring scalable, long-term security.
Accelerator for Classical and Post-Quantum asymmetric cryptography
Compact Crypto Box IP Core for Resource-Constrained Devices
Hybrid Crypto Box IP Core with Classical and PQ Cryptography
“Summary. The leakage analysis (Welch t-test) on over 30 million traces did not show statistically significant first- and second-order differences between trace sets with fixed and random inputs. The template-based DPA analysis, on the pseudo-random trace set for the profiling phase (15 million traces) and on a sub-set of 300k fix input traces for matching phase targeting the first-round S-box output, and template attack on ciphertext, did not indicate any potential information leakage.”
” The results for the soft IP presented in the report were obtained on the TOE which is the basic hardware implementation of the soft IP without additional levels of security (e.g. that are present in a secure silicon layout). Therefore the internal strength of the soft IP itself was evaluated. This indicates that the investigated features and parameters of the soft IP implementation should be robust against SCA and fault injection attacks in different implementations including ASIC. Nevertheless, according to the Common Criteria rules, the strength of the final composite product must be evaluated on its own.”
