Hybrid Classical and Post-Quantum Cryptography IP Core for Future-Proof Security
FortifyIQ’s High-Performance Hybrid Cryptography IP core delivers accelerated support for both classical (RSA, ECC) and post-quantum (ML-KEM, ML-DSA) algorithms in a unified architecture optimized for maximum throughput. Designed for security-critical systems requiring long-term protection and cryptographic agility, the IP enables hybrid key exchange and digital signature schemes aligned with NIST recommendations. Featuring parallelized arithmetic units, pipelined execution, and shared hash acceleration, it offers exceptional performance without compromising security. With built-in SCA/FIA protections and support for FIPS 140-3 and Common Criteria certification, this core is ideal for next-generation secure boot, firmware authentication, and high-speed communication protocols.
Requires an external cryptographically secure random number generator (CSPRNG)
Cryptographic tools set including PQC support
Versatile PQC balanced accelerator
Balanced accelerator for Classical and Post-Quantum asymmetric cryptography
“Summary. The leakage analysis (Welch t-test) on over 30 million traces did not show statistically significant first- and second-order differences between trace sets with fixed and random inputs. The template-based DPA analysis, on the pseudo-random trace set for the profiling phase (15 million traces) and on a sub-set of 300k fix input traces for matching phase targeting the first-round S-box output, and template attack on ciphertext, did not indicate any potential information leakage.”
” The results for the soft IP presented in the report were obtained on the TOE which is the basic hardware implementation of the soft IP without additional levels of security (e.g. that are present in a secure silicon layout). Therefore the internal strength of the soft IP itself was evaluated. This indicates that the investigated features and parameters of the soft IP implementation should be robust against SCA and fault injection attacks in different implementations including ASIC. Nevertheless, according to the Common Criteria rules, the strength of the final composite product must be evaluated on its own.”
