Contact Us

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

We offer a comprehensive set of professional services to choose from:

Design for Security

Hardware/IC methodology development

/01

Code for Security

Software protected algorithm development

/02

Security Review

FortifyIQ analyzes your design and recommends changes to remove security vulnerabilities

/03

Contact Us for Services​

Typical services tasks and deliverables

Analysis of your needs

Configuration creation

Initial-offsite monitoring

Collection of specs and requirements

High-level design proposal and review

Low-level design review and update

Integration work

Lab testing

Optimization

Running our studio tools for you

Troubleshooting

Knowledge transfer

Consulting Services

Leverage the industry’s best-practice expertise to plan, scope, and help you design your secure solutions.
Our Professional Consulting Services allow you to:

• Reduce project risks

• Learn as much as you need to be able to continue on your own

• Stay within project timelines

• Leverage proven methodologies to minimize costs, reduce errors, and expedite deployment

Implementation Services

To ensure successful integration, configuration, and deployment of FortifyIQ products and solutions, our Professional Implementation Services help you to increase the value and improve the performance of your investment while reducing overall business risks.

Our Implementation Services are based on the deliverables and on the activities essential to getting FortifyIQ solutions into production. We offer several levels of engagement, depending on your needs and your budget.

Training Services

Reach the highest efficiency of integrating our products into your workflow by learning what we do and how we do it by training with our Professional Training Services consultants who will teach your staff the ins and outs of our proprietary patent-pending technology.

Contact FortifyIQ to discuss your Security Assessment

Fortify’s AES security evaluation by SGS

“Summary. The leakage analysis (Welch t-test) on over 30 million traces did not show statistically significant first- and second-order differences between trace sets with fixed and random inputs. The template-based DPA analysis, on the pseudo-random trace set for the profiling phase (15 million traces) and on a sub-set of 300k fix input traces for matching phase targeting the first-round S-box output, and template attack on ciphertext, did not indicate any potential information leakage.”

” The results for the soft IP presented in the report were obtained on the TOE which is the basic hardware implementation of the soft IP without additional levels of security (e.g. that are present in a secure silicon layout). Therefore the internal strength of the soft IP itself was evaluated. This indicates that the investigated features and parameters of the soft IP implementation should be robust against SCA and fault injection attacks in different implementations including ASIC. Nevertheless, according to the Common Criteria rules, the strength of the final composite product must be evaluated on its own.”

Request Technical Details